Coingi - Exchange Review

Coingi crypto exchange platform

What is Coingi

Coingi was founded around 2014 in the Czech Republic (though some sources suggest China), initially as a crypto-to-crypto exchange. It later added fiat support, including CZK, EUR and USD. The platform offered trading for around 14 pairs, covering major coins and some altcoins.

Trading Volume & Activity

Current trading activity appears minimal. CoinMarketCap labels the exchange as untracked and inactive, with no public volume data. One source reported around $550k volume historically, but there’s no sign of recent activity and order books seem empty.

Fees & Trading Features

Coingi used a flat 0.20 percent trading fee. Maker and taker fees were similar, starting around 0.10 percent maker and 0.20 percent taker. Withdrawal and deposit fees varied by currency, including small fixed costs for BTC, LTC, ETH, and fiat transfers. No margin, lending, or advanced tools like stop-loss were offered.

Security & Compliance

Originally Coingi claimed strong security: offline cold wallets, encryption, two-factor authentication, and internal monitoring against suspicious access. However, a Mozilla Observatory test rated its security protocols as low (F), indicating subpar web security. User reviews also point to unauthorized account access and unresponsive support.

Reputation & User Sentiment

User feedback is mixed to negative. Trustpilot gives a 2.6/5 average, including reports of lost or frozen deposits and slow support responses. Official reviews touted it as a reliable platform with intuitive interface and affiliate programs, yet these positive mentions are few and dated.

Pros and Cons

Who it suited

Coingi may have served casual European crypto users years ago, offering Fiat-CZK/EUR/USD trading with basic tools. Today, it’s only relevant for crypto historians or those investigating legacy exchanges - definitely not a viable trading venue.

Final verdict

Coingi once looked promising: low fees, fiat options, and fair security claims. But now it shows zero activity, poor web security, and user complaints. It’s effectively a dead, untrusted exchange - better treated as a relic than a functioning platform. Avoid it unless conducting historical research.

Next Review: LATOKEN

Back to list: All Exchanges